1161. de
Strong's Concordance
de: but, and, now, (a connective or adversative particle)
Original Word: δ?
Part of Speech: Conjunction
Transliteration: de
Phonetic Spelling: (deh)
Definition: but, and, now, (a connective or adversative particle)
Usage: a weak adversative particle, generally placed second in its clause; but, on the other hand, and.
HELPS Word-studies

1161 (a conjunction) – moreover, indeed now?.?.?.?, on top of this?.?.?.?, next?.?.?.

NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
a prim. word
Definition
but, and, now, (a connective or adversative particle)
NASB Translation
after (2), also (2), another* (8), even (4), even though (1), former* (1), however (6), moreover (1), moreover* (1), nevertheless (1), now (267), or (6), other (1), other hand (4), others* (3), partly (1), rather (1), so (12), suppose* (1), then (6), therefore (1), though (1), what (1), when (3), whereas (2), yes (1), yet (25).

Thayer's Greek Lexicon
STRONGS NT 1161: δ?

δ? (related to δ?, as μ?ν to μ?ν, cf. Klotz ad Devar. ii. 2, p. 355), a particle adversative, distinctive, disjunctive, but, moreover (Winers Grammar, § 53, 7 and 10, 2); it is much more frequent in the historical parts of the N. T. than in the other books, very rare in the Epistles of John and the Apocalypse. (On its general neglect of elision (when the next word begins with a vowel) cf. Tdf. Proleg., p. 96; WHs Appendix, p. 146; Winers Grammar, § 5, 1a.; Buttmann, p. 10f) It is used:

1. universally, by way of opposition and distinction; it is added to statements opposed to a preceding statement: ??ν ?φθαλμ?? κτλ. Matthew 6:23; ?λε?σονται δ? ?μ?ραι, Mark 2:20; it opposes persons to persons or things previously mentioned or thought of — either with strong emphasis: ?γ? δ?, Matthew 5:22, 28, 32, 34, 39, 44; ?με?? δ?, 1 Corinthians 1:23; 2 Corinthians 10:13; σ? δ?, Matthew 6:6; ?με?? δ?, Mark 8:29; ο? δ? υ?ο? τ?? βασιλε?α?, Matthew 8:12; α? ?λ?πεκε? ... ? δ? υ??? το? ?νθρ?που Matthew 8:20; Luke 9:58; π?? ? λα?? ... ο? δ? φαρισα?οι, Luke 7:29f; ? δ? πνευματικ??, 1 Corinthians 2:15, and often; — or with a slight discrimination, ? δ?, α?τ?? δ?: Mark 1:45; Mark 5:34; Mark 6:37; Mark 7:6; Matthew 13:29, 37, 52; Matthew 15:23ff; Luke 4:40, 43; Luke 5:16; Luke 6:8; Luke 8:10, 54; Luke 15:29; ο? δ?, Matthew 2:5; Mark 3:4; Mark 8:28, etc., etc.; with the addition also of a proper name, as ? δ? ?ησο??: Matthew 8:22 (Tdf. omits ?ησο??); (R G Tr brackets); (Tdf. omits ?ησο??); ; Mark 1:41 (R G L marginal reading Tr marginal reading); ?ποκροκριθει? δ? (?) Σ?μων, Luke 7:43 R G L brackets; ? δ? Μαρ?α, Luke 2:19, etc.

2. μ?ν ... δ?, see μ?ν.

3. after negative sentences, but, but rather (German wohlaber): Matthew 6:19f (μ? θησαυρ?ζετε ... θησαυρ?ζετε δ?); f; Acts 12:9, 14; Romans 3:4; Romans 4:5; 1 Corinthians 1:10; 1 Corinthians 7:37; 1 Thessalonians 5:21 (not Rec.); Ephesians 4:14; Hebrews 2:5; Hebrews 4:13, 15; Hebrews 9:12; Hebrews 10:26; Hebrews 12:13; 1 Peter 1:12 (ο?χ ?αυτο?? ?μ?ν (Rec. ?μ?ν) δ?); James 1:13; James 2:11.

4. it is joined to terms which are repeated with a certain emphasis, and with such additions as tend to explain and establish them more exactly; in this use of the particle we may supply a suppressed negative clause and give its force in English by inserting I say, and that, so then, etc.): Romans 3:21f (not that common δικαιοσ?νη which the Jews boasted of and strove after, but δικαιοσυνεσ? ... δι? π?στεω?); Romans 9:30; 1 Corinthians 2:6 (σοφ?αν δ? ο? το? α??νο? το?του); Galatians 2:2 (I went up, not of my own accord, but etc.); Philippians 2:8; cf. Klotz ad Dev. ii. 2, p. 361f; L. Dindorf in Stephanus Thesaurus ii. col. 928; (cf. Winer's Grammar, 443 (412)).

5. it serves to mark a transition to something new (δ? metabatic); by this use of the particle, the new addition is distinguished from and, as it were, opposed to what goes before: Matthew 1:18; Matthew 2:19; Matthew 10:21; Luke 12:13; Luke 13:1; John 7:14, 37; Acts 6:1; Romans 8:28; 1 Corinthians 7:1; 1 Corinthians 8:1, etc., etc.; so also in the phrase ?γ?νετο δ?, see γ?νομαι, 2 c.

6. it introduces explanations and separates them from the things to be explained: John 3:19; John 6:39; 1 Corinthians 1:12; 1 Corinthians 7:6, 29; Ephesians 5:32, etc.; — especially remarks and explanations intercalated into the discourse, or added, as it were, by way of appendix: Mark 5:13 (?σαν δ? etc. R L brackets); (R G); John 6:10; John 9:14; John 12:3; το?το δ? γ?γονε, Matthew 1:22; Matthew 21:4. Owing to this use, the particle not infrequently came to be confounded in the manuscripts (of secular writings also) with γ?ρ; cf. Winer on Galatians 1:11; Fritzsche on Mark 14:2; also his Commentary on Romans, vol. i., pp. 234, 265; ii., p. 476; iii., p. 196; (Winers Grammar, 452 (421); Buttmann, 363 (312)).

7. after a parenthesis or an explanation which had led away from the subject under discussion, it serves to take up the discourse again (cf. Winer's Grammar, 443 (412)): Matthew 3:4; Luke 4:1; Romans 5:8; 2 Corinthians 2:12; 2 Corinthians 5:8; 2 Corinthians 10:2; Ephesians 2:4; cf. Klotz ad Devar. ii. 2, p. 376f.

8. it introduces the apodosis and, as it were, opposes it to the protasis: Acts 11:17 R G (1 Macc. 14:29; 2 Macc. 1:34); after a participial construction which has the force of a protasis: Colossians 1:22 (21); cf. Matthiae 2:1470; Kühner, 2:818; (Jelf, § 770); Klotz as above, p. 370f; (Buttmann, 364 (312)).

9. κα? ... δ?, but ... also, yea and, moreover also: Matthew 10:18; Matthew 16:18; Luke 2:35 (WH text omits; L Tr brackets δ?); John 6:51; John 15:27; Acts 3:24; Acts 22:29; Romans 11:23; 2 Timothy 3:12; 1 John 1:3; 2 Peter 1:5; cf. Klotz as above, p. 645f; Buttmann, 364 (312); (also Winer's Grammar, 443 (413); Ellicott on 1 Timothy 3:10; Meyer on John 6:51). ??ν δ? yea even if: John 8:16.

10. δ? never stands as the first word in the sentence, but generally second; and when the words to which it is added cannot be separated, it stands third (as in Matthew 10:11; Matthew 18:25; Mark 4:34; Luke 10:31; Acts 17:6; Acts 28:6; Galatians 3:23; 2 Timothy 3:8, etc.; in ο? μ?νον δ?, Romans 5:3, 11, etc.), or even in the fourth place, Matthew 10:18; John 6:51; John 8:16; 1 John 1:3; 1 Corinthians 4:18; (Luke 22:69 L T Tr WH).

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
also, and, but, moreover, now.

A primary particle (adversative or continuative); but, and, etc. -- also, and, but, moreover, now (often unexpressed in English).

Forms and Transliterations
δ δ' ΔΕ δ? δ? δι' κα? τε d d' DE dé dè kai kaì te
Links
Interlinear Greek ? Interlinear Hebrew ? Strong's Numbers ? Englishman's Greek Concordance ? Englishman's Hebrew Concordance ? Parallel Texts
Englishman's Concordance
Matthew 1:2 Conj
GRK: ?σα?κ ?σα?κ δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Isaac; and Isaac begat
INT: Issac Isaac moreover was father of

Matthew 1:2 Conj
GRK: ?ακ?β ?ακ?β δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Jacob; and Jacob begat
INT: Jacob Jacob moreover was father of

Matthew 1:3 Conj
GRK: ?ο?δα? δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: And Judas begat
INT: Judah moreover was father of

Matthew 1:3 Conj
GRK: Θ?μαρ Φαρ?? δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: of Thamar; and Phares begat
INT: Tamar Perez moreover was father of

Matthew 1:3 Conj
GRK: ?σρ?μ ?σρ?μ δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Esrom; and Esrom begat
INT: Hezron Hezron moreover was father of

Matthew 1:4 Conj
GRK: ?ρ?μ δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: And Aram begat
INT: Ram moreover was father of

Matthew 1:4 Conj
GRK: ?μιναδ?β ?μιναδ?β δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat
INT: Amminadab Amminadab moreover was father of

Matthew 1:4 Conj
GRK: Ναασσ?ν Ναασσ?ν δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Naasson; and Naasson begat
INT: Nahshon Nahshon moreover was father of

Matthew 1:5 Conj
GRK: Σαλμ?ν δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: And Salmon begat
INT: Salmon moreover was father of

Matthew 1:5 Conj
GRK: ?αχ?β Βο?? δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: of Rachab; and Booz begat
INT: Rahab Boaz moreover was father of

Matthew 1:5 Conj
GRK: ?ο?θ ?ωβ?δ δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: of Ruth; and Obed begat
INT: Ruth Obed moreover was father of

Matthew 1:6 Conj
GRK: ?εσσα? δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: And Jesse begat
INT: Jesse moreover was father of

Matthew 1:6 Conj
GRK: βασιλ?α Δαυ?δ δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: David the king; and David the king
INT: king David moreover was father of

Matthew 1:7 Conj
GRK: Σολομ?ν δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: And Solomon begat
INT: Solomon moreover was father of

Matthew 1:7 Conj
GRK: ?οβο?μ ?οβο?μ δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Roboam; and Roboam begat
INT: Rehoboam Rehoboam moreover was father of

Matthew 1:7 Conj
GRK: ?βι? ?βι? δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Abia; and Abia begat
INT: Abijah Abijah moreover was father of

Matthew 1:8 Conj
GRK: ?σ?φ δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: And Asa begat
INT: Asa moreover was father of

Matthew 1:8 Conj
GRK: ?ωσαφ?τ ?ωσαφ?τ δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat
INT: Jehoshaphat Jehoshaphat moreover was father of

Matthew 1:8 Conj
GRK: ?ωρ?μ ?ωρ?μ δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Joram; and Joram begat
INT: Joram Joram moreover was father of

Matthew 1:9 Conj
GRK: ?ζ?α? δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: And Ozias begat
INT: Uzziah moreover was father of

Matthew 1:9 Conj
GRK: ?ωαθ?μ ?ωαθ?μ δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Joatham; and Joatham begat
INT: Jotham Jotham moreover was father of

Matthew 1:9 Conj
GRK: ?χ?ζ ?χ?ζ δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Achaz; and Achaz begat
INT: Ahaz Ahaz moreover was father of

Matthew 1:10 Conj
GRK: ?ζεκ?α? δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: And Ezekias begat
INT: Hezekiah moreover was father of

Matthew 1:10 Conj
GRK: Μανασσ? Μανασσ?? δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Manasses; and Manasses begat
INT: Manasseh Manasseh moreover was father of

Matthew 1:10 Conj
GRK: ?μ?? ?μ?? δ? ?γ?ννησεν τ?ν
KJV: begat Amon; and Amon begat
INT: Amos Amos moreover was father of

Strong's Greek 1161
2810 Occurrences


δ' — 24 Occ.
δ? — 2786 Occ.









1160b
Top of Page
Top of Page






电竞下注